Ad Blocker Detected
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker for Movingsnow.com.
Fifteen years ago the power output of every snowblower sold here in the United States was listed in hp or horsepower. It was a nice simple measurement that everyone in the U.S. was used to.
Then in 2007 or the rules were changed and the engine manufactures started using gross torque as a measurement of the engine’s power . Of course, no one understood what this meant and even though companies like Briggs & Stratton tried to explain it, it still didn’t make much sense.
Then they changed the rules on us again. In fact, this was so confusing that in the 2008/2009 season most snowblower engine manufacturers dropped the torque measurement and now only give us engine size in cc’s.
Today, in the fall of 2020, only a few counties use HP or the metric equivalent. Most, including the U.S. just the cc.
So, this cc to HP chart is as accurate as I can make it. Husqvarna still uses HP in some parts of the world and a few other reputable sources also have the HP in their model numbers. cc to HP
Check all the latest snowblowers here: The Best Snowblowers For You! Fall 2020
cc to HP chart!
I’ll leave the original article below but Husqvarna and others have been nice enough to rate their new engines.
Husqvarna LCT Snow
|Cylinder displacement||136 cc||208 cc||208 cc||254 cc|
|Net power at preset rpm||4 kW @ 3450 rpm||4 kW @ 3450 rpm||4.7 kW @ 3600 rpm||5.6 kW @ 3600 rpm|
|Horsepower||3.5 hp / 2.61 kW||5.4 hp / 4.03 kW||6.3 hp / 4.7 kW||8.5 hp / 6.34 kW|
|Gross Torque||9.5 lb-ft||9.5 lb-ft||9.5 lb-ft||12.5 lb-ft|
|Cylinder displacement||291 cc||369 cc||414 cc||420 cc|
|Net power at preset rpm||7.2 kW @ 3600 rpm||8.25 kW @ 3600 rpm||9.1 kW @ 3600 rpm|
|Horsepower||9.6 hp / 7.16 kW||11 hp / 8.2 kW||12.2 hp / 9.1 kW||14 hp ?|
|Gross Torque||14.5 lb-ft||17 lb-ft||18.5 lb-ft||25.5 lb-ft|
Briggs & Stratton Snow
|Cylinder displacement||163||205 cc||250 cc||305 cc||420 cc||420 cc|
|Net power at preset rpm|
|Gross Torque||7.5 lb-ft||9.5 lb-ft||11.5 lb-ft||14.5 lb-ft||16.5 lb-ft||21 lb-ft|
|Engine manufacturer||Honda GC190||Honda GX200||Honda GX270||Honda GX390|
|Cylinder displacement||187 cc||196 cc||270 cc||389 cc|
|Net power at preset rpm||5.2 HP (3.9 kW)/3,600 rpm||5.5 HP (4.1 kW)/3,600 rpm||8.5 HP (6.3 kW)/3,600 rpm||11.7 HP (8.7 kW/3,600 rpm|
|Gross Torque||8.3 lb-ft (11.3 Nm)/2,500 rpm||9.1 lb-ft (12.4 Nm)/2,500 rpm||14.1 lb-ft (19.1 Nm)/2,500 rpm||19.5 lb-ft (26.4 Nm)/2,500 rpm|
|Cylinder displacement||99 cc||212 cc||252 cc||265 cc||302 cc||420 cc|
|Net power at preset rpm||4.0kW/3600rpm||4.4kW/3600rpm||5.3kW/3600rpm||6.2kW/3600rpm||7.8kW/3600rpm||9.0kW/3600rpm|
|Horsepower||5 HP||7 HP||8HP||9HP||10HP||14HP|
I spent a great deal of time researching this and I’m not going to spend time trying to explain why the engine manufacturers have changed their terminology. Instead, I’m just going to show you a formula you can use to figure it out yourself.
Here’s the formula I used from the Briggs & Stratton website (rpm x torque / 5,252) The engine manufacturer’s used 3600 rpm most of the time to rate the engine’s horsepower so I will use that number in the formula. I also used the torque ratings from the Briggs & Stratton website for their motors to keep this chart simple. Other manufacturers (like Powermore) may have different torque ratings for their motors.
If you are trying to get exact hp measurements you should research the torque ratings for the specific brand.
For 2009/2010 MTD has dropped all torque ratings on snow throwers. The engines are only labeled in cc’s.
Here is a simple chart of approximate cc to torque to horsepower conversions. It’s not exact, but it will give you a better idea of how big the new engines are. I used 3600 rpm in the formula for this comparison. Assume that your new snowblower motor runs at less rpm.
123 cc = 4 hp
179 cc = 5 hp
208 cc = 8 to 9 Gross Torque = 5.5 to 7 hp
243cc = 8 HP
277 cc = 11 to 11.5 Gross Torque = 8 to 9 hp
305 cc = 13.5 to 14.5 Gross Torque = 9 to 10 hp
342 cc = 15.5 to 16.5 Gross Torque = 11 to 12 hp
357 cc = 13 hp
420 cc = 14 hp
To me, cc’s is not a good comparison from one motor to another. It is also not a good comparison from one manufacturer to another. For example, a 190cc Briggs & Stratton side valve motor will not have the same power as a Honda 190cc overhead valve motor. cc’c don’t give you a good measurement of what the engine is capable of. True, an overhead valve motor from a specific manufacturer should have more power with more cc’s but there are a lot of other factors that go into determining how much power is available for you to use. The true power of a motor is determined by engine type, (overhead valve/side valve) carburetor (naturally aspirated/fuel injected/turbo) rpm you use it at (2750/3100/3650) and many other factors. I hope this helps.
Here is an explanation of torque from Briggs & Stratton
Here is an original article on this issue:
Horsepower loses its grip on mowers. In terms of engines, talk turns to torque
By Rick Barrett
Published on: 02/23/08
When you buy lawn and garden equipment this spring, a familiar old term —- horsepower —- will be missing from many engines.
Blame it on lawyers, or engine makers who might have fudged the numbers, but horsepower is no longer the gold standard for small gasoline engines.
Sears, for example, advertises some lawn mowers rated by horsepower, others by torque, and still others by cubic centimeters. And some mowers have no such designation at all.
“Unfortunately, we are not giving consumers the answers they want,” said Bill Rotter, an owner of National Ace Hardware stores in the Milwaukee area.
There’s no longer a horsepower rating for many Briggs & Stratton engines. Last year, Briggs chose torque as its rating system for push mowers, snow throwers, pressure washers, and generators.
In basic terms, torque is a measure of the force needed to turn something like a wrench or a lawnmower blade.
“We think it’s a better measurement of a mower’s ability to cut grass,” said Rick Zeckmeister, North American consumer marketing director at Briggs & Stratton, the world’s largest manufacturer of small gasoline engines.
Horsepower, on the other hand, evolved from a measure of the rate at which a horse could pull coal up a mine shaft into a more technical measurement related to watts. Although most people don’t know its technical meaning, many have found it useful in comparing the power of engines.
So now, consumers may face confusion over how torque equates to horsepower. There isn’t a practical conversion chart because torque and horsepower are two different things.
“Torque doesn’t mean much to the consumer,” Rotter said. “And it’s more complicated for us because it’s almost impossible to try and explain what gross torque means” to someone buying a lawnmower.
Rotter said he wouldn’t be surprised if, down the road, engine manufacturers return to horsepower ratings.
Lawsuit spurs change
The shift away from horsepower ratings came after a lawsuit in Illinois claimed that engine manufacturers were overstating the horsepower of lawn mower engines.
In some cases, the lawsuit alleged, identical engines were labeled with different horsepower ratings, misleading consumers into believing they were getting more power by purchasing more expensive models.
Briggs advertised one engine as having 6.75 horsepower and yet told the Environmental Protection Agency the same engine had 3.6 horsepower, an 88 percent overstatement, according to the lawsuit.
Since at least 1997, engine manufacturers Briggs, Tecumseh, Kohler, Toro, and Kawasaki have reported horsepower ratings to the EPA that were significantly lower than the ratings advertised to the public, the lawsuit said.
For Briggs, it wasn’t an attempt to mislead anyone, according to Tom Savage, a senior vice president at the company.
There are different testing protocols for the EPA than for the general public, Savage said. The EPA ratings are based on a “composite” of test results at different engine loads, while results for the general public are based on an engine’s full power capabilities.
An Illinois judge dismissed the suit last March, but it may resurface.
“It’s still not totally resolved because the judge did not tell us what portions of the suit he dismissed with prejudice or not. So in effect, it allows the lawyers to come back,” said James Brenn, Briggs’ chief financial officer.
The suit included plaintiffs from across the nation, including Susan Barnard, a librarian from Green Bay, Wis.
Barnard bought a Yard Machines mower for $263.70 that was supposed to have a 5-horsepower Briggs engine. Although she was happy with the mower, she was miffed when lawyers involved in the lawsuit contacted her and told her the engine was less powerful than billed.
“I said, ‘Those dirty buggers. You get them to stop doing that. Put me on the lawsuit,'” she said in an interview.
Over the years, manufacturers in the intensely competitive small-engine business have used horsepower ratings as a marketing tool.
“Horsepower sells,” said Jeff Hebbard, a vice president at Ariens Co., a Brillion, Wis.-based manufacturer of lawn tractors and other outdoor power equipment. “It doesn’t always sell for the right reasons, but it does sell.”
The horsepower race sounds like what has occurred with electric motors, where power claims have been embellished, said Kevin Brady, a Minneapolis attorney and engineer not affiliated with the horsepower lawsuit.
“You can exaggerate a bit and not get in trouble,” Brady said. “It’s called puffing.”
In reporting to the EPA, engine manufacturers have some leeway to fudge horsepower ratings by about 15 percent.
Sometimes, the same engine is advertised as having different horsepower ratings depending on how it’s sold.
“There are slight adjustments that get them there, but it’s the same engine,” Hebbard said.
Ariens buys engines from Briggs, Kohler, Honda and other manufacturers.
It has been challenging for the engine makers to find a rating system that works, said Dan Ariens, company president.
“Americans are very familiar with horsepower. It’s a number they kind of understand,” Ariens said.
It’s uncertain which power standard the small-engine manufacturers will settle on, if they agree at all.
“Some guys like to have cubic centimeters as their standard, some like torque, and some like horsepower,” said Savage of Briggs & Stratton. “I don’t know if there will be a one-size-fits-all solution.”
What to look for, according to Peter Sawchuk, a Consumer Reports power equipment expert.
Ignore: horsepower, torque or engine displacement
Pay attention to: The mower’s cutting width and overall performance, rather than engine statistics.
Look for: An engine with an overhead valve system. It might be more expensive, but it will last longer.
GLOSSARY OF ENGINE TERMS
Torque: Briggs & Stratton says torque is the best way to rate an engine that powers a push lawn mower, snow thrower, pressure washer or other equipment where the engine is turning something. Torque, in basic terms, is a twisting force that causes rotation.
Horsepower: Engine manufacturers typically measure horsepower by operating a “bare” engine, not equipped with accessories or installed in power equipment, at a given engine speed. In technical terms, a unit of horsepower is equal to 745.7 watts, another measurement of power.
Since torque and horsepower are two different things, Briggs says it can’t do a direct comparison.
Cubic centimeters: The volume of the engine’s cylinder chamber. An engine with more cubic centimeters should produce more power. But that could be affected by other features of the engine, including its fuel injector or carburetor.
Here is a link that might be useful: AJC Article
From Popular Mechanics Sept 2017: Here’s the Only Horsepower vs. Torque Explanation You’ll Ever Need To Read
Get more stuff like this
Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.
Thank you for subscribing.
Something went wrong.